Can lactate levels and lactate kinetics predict mortality in patients with COVID-19 with using qCSI scoring system?

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between blood lactate levels and lactate kinetics (lactate clearance and Δ lactate) for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department. METHODS: This study was performed as a retrospective study that included patients admitted to the emergency department between March 1st, 2020, and January 1st, 2022. Lactate levels were recorded at the first admission (0 h lactate) and the highest blood lactate levels in the first 24 h of follow-up (2nd highest lactate). Lactate kinetics were calculated. Clinical severity was determined according to the quick COVID Severity Index (qCSI). RESULTS: 300 patients were included in the study. Lactate levels at admission were similar in groups with or without mortality, but 2nd highest lactate levels were found to be significantly higher in the group with mortality (p < 0.001). Lactate clearance and ∆ lactate levels were also found to be lower in the mortality group (p < 0.001). Lactate kinetics in patients in the clinically low severity group were lower in the mortality group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.039, respectively). In the low-intermediate and high-intermediate groups, 0-h lactate and 2nd highest lactate levels were found to be higher in the mortality group, and lactate kinetics were similar in the groups with and without mortality. In the group with high clinical severity, 2nd highest lactate levels were found to be higher in the group with mortality (p = 0.010). Lactate kinetics were also found to be significantly lower in the mortality group (p < 0.001). In the high qCSI group, based on ROC analysis, the AUC for 2nd highest lactate levels predicting mortality was 0.642 (95% CI: 0.548-0.728). The optimal cut-off value for mortality was greater than >2.4 mmol/L (60.6% sensitivity, 67.4% specificity). The AUC for lactate clearance was 0.748 (95% CI: 0.659-0.824). The lactate clearance cut-off value was ≤ -177.78% (49.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity). The AUC for ∆ lactate was 0.707 (95% CI: 0.616-0.787). The optimal ∆ lactate cut-off was ≤ -2 mmol/L (45.1% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity). CONCLUSION: In COVID-19, 2nd highest blood lactate and lactate kinetics were found to be prognostic indicators of the disease. High 2nd highest lactate levels and low lactate kinetics in patients with high clinical severity were guiding physicians regarding the outcome of the disease.

One-on-one comparison between qCSI and NEWS scores for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for 90-day mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in adult patients transferred by ambulance to an emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19 infection subsequently confirmed by a SARS-CoV-2 test (polymerase chain reaction). We collected epidemiological data, clinical covariates (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, level of consciousness and use of supplemental oxygen) and hospital variables. The primary outcome was cumulative all-cause mortality during a 90-day follow-up, with mortality assessment monitoring time points at 1, 2, 7, 14, 30 and 90 days from ED attendance. Comparison of performances for 90-day mortality between both scores was carried out by univariate analysis. RESULTS: From March to November 2020, we included 2,961 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (median age 79 years, IQR 66-88), with 49.2% females. The qCSI score provided an AUC ranging from 0.769 (1-day mortality) to 0.749 (90-day mortality), whereas AUCs for NEWS ranging from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality. At all-time points studied, differences between both scores were statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with SARS-CoV-2 can rapidly develop bilateral pneumonias with multiorgan disease; in these cases, in which an evacuation by the EMS is required, reliable scores for an early identification of patients with risk of clinical deterioration are critical. The NEWS score provides not only better prognostic results than those offered by qCSI at all the analyzed time points, but it is also better suited for COVID-19 patients.KEY MESSAGESThis work aims to determine whether NEWS is the best score for mortality risk assessment in patients with COVID-19.AUCs for NEWS ranged from 0.825 for 1-day mortality to 0.777 for 90-day mortality and were significantly higher than those for qCSI in these same outcomes.NEWS provides a better prognostic capacity than the qCSI score and allows for long-term (90 days) mortality risk assessment of COVID-19 patients.

Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Older Patients with Specifically Developed Scores.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several scoring systems have been specifically developed for risk stratification in COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: We compared, in a cohort of confirmed COVID-19 older patients, three specifically developed scores with a previously established early warning score. Main endpoint was all causes in-hospital death. SETTING: This is a single-center, retrospective observational study, conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, referral center for COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the clinical records of the confirmed COVID-19 patients aged 60 years or more consecutively admitted to our ED over a 6-week period (March 1st to April 15th, 2020). A total of 210 patients, aged between 60 and 98 years were included in the study cohort. MEASUREMENTS: International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium Clinical Characterization Protocol-Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (ISARIC-4C) score, COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (COVID-GRAM), quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS). RESULTS: Median age was 74 (67-82) and 133 (63.3%) were males. Globally, 42 patients (20.0%) deceased. All the score evaluated showed a fairly good predictive value with respect to in-hospital death. The ISARIC-4C score had the highest area under ROC curve (AUROC) 0.799 (0.738-0.851), followed by the COVID-GRAM 0.785 (0.723-0.838), NEWS 0.764 (0.700-0.819), and qCSI 0.749 (0.685-0.806). However, these differences were not statistical significant. CONCLUSION: Among the evaluated scores, the ISARIC-4C and the COVID-GRAM, calculated at ED admission, had the best performance, although the qCSI had similar efficacy by evaluating only three items. However, the NEWS, already widely validated in clinical practice, had a similar performance and could be appropriate for older patients with COVID-19.